|

Earned Income Tax
Credit (EITC): A Hand Up...or a Hand-out?
By
Rob Wilkinson,
Contributing Writer: The Local Planet Weekly
There are some that will tell you that the Earned Income
Tax Credit (EITC) is the
best thing since baked beans. Spokane citizens got a good
feel for that mindset when the EITC was heavily and urgently
promoted during last years ONE Spokane Conferences
to fight poverty, encouraging low-income families to get
what they had coming to them. I perceived that particular
move as a cheap, Mayor John Powers slap-shot
and just another way to weasel-out of, (1) solid economic
development, (2) tax base restructuring, and (3) Spokane
government getting what was coming to THEM,
relying on the nearly $10 million in EITC that sits unclaimed
by Spokanes low-income families, thus pouring money
back into local government vaults.
Yet others will tell you the EITC is the most abused tax
credit system in the
nation. Whos right?
EITC provides tax reductions and wage supplements for low
and moderate income
families. Since 1975, with updates in 1986, 1990 and 1993,
and an additional
expansion in 2001, more than 19 million families have claimed
EITC - roughly one out of seven taxpayers.
The EITC has been widely praised as a system that, (1)
supports employment, and, (2) reduces poverty. Reportedly,
some 4.8 million people (including 2.6 million
children) are removed from poverty due to the
EITC. One of the major questions regarding the reduction
of poverty is - for how long, which implies that the
EITC is nothing but a once-a year temporary Band-Aid, covering
up a still festering, existing and ongoing problem: poverty.
It has also been noted by critics that the EITC just allows
a poor family to play yearly catch-up, which
reoccurs until either economic stability is achieved
or
they have fallen through the socioeconomic cracks.
The EITC has also been touted as an incentive for single
moms with children to
return to work
but what kind of work is most often
scrutinized. Many single moms with children, if their skills
are minimal for todays labor market, are working in
dead-end, low-paying jobs - mainly retail or service-oriented.
One might then have to ask: Is the EITC a buy-out
for single moms, just to put a few tax dollars back into
their pockets to keep em smiling, in return for taking
low-paying, no benefits and go-nowhere jobs of which Spokane
seems to have an abundance of?
The EITC likes to tout its success by bringing up the fact
that many states have
also enacted an earned income tax credit on top of the standard
federal EITC. It has been reported that seventeen states
now offer EITCs based on the federal tax credit guidelines.
Although were into tougher economic times, many states
have recognized that EITCs may be helping keep families
afloat, even though the programs themselves are in jeopardy
due to crunches felt in many state treasuries. In reducing
poverty, the EITCs reportedly boosts the
family income to above the federal poverty guidelines, thus
giving the illusion that another low-income
family is out of poverty. For example, a family of four,
with two children and one year-round worker earning about
$7/hr. has total earnings well below the federal poverty
guidelines. Such a family, during this tax year, qualifies
for an EITC of $4,204 plus a small federal child tax credit,
bring the familys income close to the poverty line.!
If this family lived in one of the states that offered a
state EITC, then chances
are they would get another $631
or a total family income
that would put this family of four just above the poverty
line.
One of the major errors of the above type of thinking is:
the federal poverty levels
have no reality basis because economics vary from county-to-county,
state-to-state, and the federal poverty guidelines do not
take this into account...as proven by
grant-funded research done in 2002 by Dr. Diana Pearce.
The poverty guidelines set by the government is a one
size fits all blanket, which is economically
unrealistic. So, if the above sample family, with income,
the EITCs and additional
child tax credit, makes $18,830 for a family of four, where
is this income going to
stretch the most
in King County, or in Stevens County?
Robert McIntyre, of The American Prospect: Lets
pretend that the government
decided to place bushel baskets full of cash at every street
corner, with the
following attached note: Please read the attached instructions
and take the
appropriate amount, if any, from the basket. Write your
name, address, and the
amount you took on the sign-in sheet. WARNING! We will check
one out of fifty names, and anyone we find taking too much
will have to give the money back. Would the federal
government do something this inane? Hardly. But they may
as well do just that with the EITC, which is one of the
largest cash transfers in the government, for low-income
families. In truth, about half the people who take money
out of the EITC basket do so honestly; the bad news is that
the other half takes more than they should.
Overall, the EITC does a fair job at putting money into
the pockets of the
low-income families of America. However, because the program
is touted for
rewarding work and totally dependent upon the
workers wages, rewarding work is only
true to a certain degree. For minimum-wage parents, EITC
can add up to nearly 40 cents to each dollar earned. On
the other hand, as the EITC begins to fade-out,
it punishes work by imposing a 21 percent added tax on earnings
between $14,000 and $34,000. The EITC also imposes strict
marriage penalties that no one has seemingly figured out
how to resolve.
And the largest of problems: how the EITC is policed.
Since it has gotten so large - maxing out at $4,204 for
a family with two children -
lots of people cheat to get the money. Even though Congress
has insisted that the
IRS crack-down on the abuses and the IRS has stepped-up
the number of audited
claims, the EITC audit rate is still only 2 percent.
It is believed that EITC should still be preserved, but
in a modified form so that
endemic cheating is deterred. How to go about that is still
unknown, but a solution
should be found soon so that the money actually goes to
those families who really
need it and NOT to the cheaters...nor money-hungry
local governments. Perhaps
theres a Federal agency that would be more adept at
managing the program, before the cheating gets so out of
hand that EITC loses all support and then will be
unavailable to anyone.
Hopefully that wont happen.
Submit Article
|